課程名稱 |
健康與疾病之護理處置 Nursing Intervention to Health and Illness |
開課學期 |
105-2 |
授課對象 |
醫學院 護理學研究所 |
授課教師 |
羅美芳 |
課號 |
NURSE8030 |
課程識別碼 |
426 D4440 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
2.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
必修 |
上課時間 |
星期三3,4(10:20~12:10) |
上課地點 |
護討論室1 |
備註 |
與高碧霞、蔡劭瑜合開 限博士班 總人數上限:20人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1052Intervention |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
This course addresses the current theories and research in the study of nursing therapeutics. We describe the implications of nursing therapeutics on research design and clinical practice and examine the practice of nursing to promote, maintain and restore human health.
https://nol.ntu.edu.tw/nol/guest/index.php |
課程目標 |
1.Articulate the nature, conceptual bases and scope of nursing therapeutics.
2.Explore the evidence synthesis of specific nursing interventions in theoretical basis, methodology, measurements and findings.
3.Identify issues related to the empirical knowledge relating to the effectiveness of nursing therapeutics.
4.Develop the perspectives on the development of the science of nursing therapeutics.
|
課程要求 |
出席、參與討論與作業 |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
|
指定閱讀 |
1. Conceptual basis of nursing therapeutics
曾雯琦、盧美秀(2014)•世紀回眸-臺灣護理研究的演變及發展•護理雜誌,61(4,特刊),46-54。
蔣立琦(2014)•護理新視界-實證護理的演變及發展•護理雜誌,61(4,特刊),85-94。
Fawcett, J., Watson, J., Neuman, B., Walker, P. H., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2001). On nursing theories and evidence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(2), 115-119. (required)
Murray, S., Holmes, D., & Rail, G. (2008). On the constitution and status of “evidence” in the health sciences. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(4), 272-280. (required)
Porter, S. (2010). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing: The challenge of evidence-based practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 33(1), 3-14. (required)
Sidani, S., Doran, D. M. & Mitchell, P. H. (2004). A theory-driven approach to evaluating quality of nursing care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(1), 60-65. (required)
2. Randomized clinical trials (Ⅰ)
參考Equator Network: Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of health Research
http://www.equator-network.org/
Bennett, J. J. (2005). The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT): Guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Nursing Research, 54(2), 128-132. (required)
Des Jarlais, D, C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & TREND group. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 331-336. (required)
Huwiler-Muntener, K., Juni, P., Junker, C., & Egger, M. (2002). Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2801-2804. (required)
Schulz, K. F. (2001). Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomized controlled trials: Why bother. Evidence-Based Nursing, 4, 4-6. (required)
3. Randomized clinical trials (Ⅱ)
Armijo-Olivo, S., Warren, S., & Magee, D. (2009). Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how to deal with missing data in clinical research: A review. Physical Therapy Review, 14(1), 36-49. (required)
Heritire, S. R., Gebski, B. J., & Keech, A. C. (2003). Inclusion of patients in clinical trials analysis: The intention-to-treat principle. Medical Journal of Australia, 179, 438-440. (required)
Polit, D. F., & Gillespie, B. M. (2010). Intention-to-treat in randomized controlled trials: Recommendations for a total trial strategy. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 355-368. (required) |
參考書目 |
1. Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D., & Newman, T. B. (2013). Designing clinical research (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
2. *Mulrow, C., & Cook, D. (1998). Systematic review: Synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physician.
3. Piantadosi, S. (2005). Cilincal trials: A methodologic perspectives (2nd ed.). New Jessey: John Wiley & Sons.
4. *Sidani, S., & Braden, C. J. (1998). Evaluating nursing intervention: A theory-driven approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. 余玉眉等著(2006)臺灣護理研究倫理議題與困境臺北:國家衛生研究院。 |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
Manuscript review and response |
20% |
|
2. |
Term paper |
40% |
|
3. |
Class participation |
40% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
2/22 |
Introduction to the course |
第2週 |
3/01 |
Conceptual basis of nursing therapeutics |
第3週 |
3/08 |
Randomized clinical trials (I) |
第4週 |
3/15 |
Randomized clinical trials (II) |
第5週 |
3/22 |
Discussion of term paper (I)-topic selection |
第6週 |
3/29 |
Prevention intervention research |
第7週 |
4/05 |
溫書假 |
第8週 |
4/12 |
Issues in conducting intervention research I:
Setting, intervener and client |
第9週 |
4/19 |
Issues in conducting intervention research II:
Content and design |
第10週 |
4/26 |
Issues in conducting intervention research III:
Analysis and outcome |
第11週 |
5/03 |
Discussion of term paper (II)-concept integration |
第12週 |
5/10 |
Alternative approaches to study therapeutics |
第13週 |
5/17 |
Meta-analysis and using of research findings
in clinical decision |
第14週 |
5/24 |
Review and critique of state of science of
clinical therapeutics: Redefine the nursing
therapeutics |
第15週 |
5/31 |
Response to reviewers' comments |
第16週 |
6/07 |
Term paper presentation |
第17週 |
6/14 |
Course evaluation |
|